If you’ve been managing money over the last six years, at
some point you’ve been asked “when are rates going to rise again” followed by
the even harder “what am I supposed to do for retirement income?”
Following last week’s equity rout that saw the S&P 500
pullback 2.69% and the ten year Treasury yield drop another 7.8%, investors and
their advisors are wondering if they’re right back to where they were in
2011. Should they commit more to their
bond portfolios and the possibility of negative real rates of return or just
given in and join the chase for higher dividend yields in equities? Everyone else did in 2014, but with the Real
Estate iShares up 5.71% in January and the SPDR Select Utilities Sector ETF up
2.33%, what happens to your portfolio if the Fed decides to hold off on rate
hikes or gulp, starts QE4? Will it be
2013 all over again?
Using the ETFG Scanner to screen funds based on trailing
twelve month yield is one way to find a higher yielding investment, but what
about those investors who aren’t interested in picking up pure high yield bond
exposure or Brazilian equity exposure?
First, change the filter under “Focus” to multiasset-target outcome and
resort the list based on assets under management. A whole cottage industry has grown around
developing funds generating higher income with less volatility and the number
of funds has grown substantially over the last several years with our filter
showing 26 funds in this space, most in existence for less than three years and
with a mix of active and passive managers.
And while there may be a flavor for every investor there are, broadly
speaking, two basic investment models they employ.
First are those funds that invest in what would be
considered the “classic” high income categories that you’ve probably had
pitched to you by a fund wholesaler such as REIT’s, MLP’s and preferred stocks
although a small allocation (20% or less) may be set aside for high yield
bonds. The focus is on generating income
but with more equity upside potential and consequently, more equity volatility
that some conservative investors might want.
The two largest funds on our list fall into this category with the Guggenheim
Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY) with a strong leaning towards financials (30.9%)
and energy stocks (23.51%) which weighted heavily on the returns in 2014, down
4.33% and 1.92% in 2015. The First Trust
NASDAQ Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV) relies on the same
equity categories to generate the bulk of its returns although the largest
single allocation is in a sister fund, the First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF
(HYLS), which as the name implies is all high yield bond, all the time. That high yield bond exposure helped dampen
some of the downside volatility although the strong 8% return in 2014 had more to
do with the REIT allocation, currently around 33% of assets.
The other (and better performing option so far this year)
is to turn to the “conservative allocation” space, where the allocation is more
bond-centric with smaller equity allocations that could provide some upside
potential but more tend to cushion capital loss in the event of a bond sell-off. A prime example would be the iShares
Morningstar Multi-Asset Income (IYLD), a fund-of-funds product that unlike CVY
or MDIV can boast a positive YTD return of 1.72%. The secret to its success is a 60% bond
allocation although only slightly less than 6% is invested in the iShares 20+
Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Approximately
45% is being put to work in investment grade and high yield credit with 20%
invested in mortgage REIT’s and International REIT’s. While that large bond allocation helps IYLD
offer a lower standard deviation of 6.6% compared to 9.83% for CVY, the trade-off
is what happens in a rising rate environment.
In 2013 IYLD delivered an uninspiring .47% return compared to 19.42% for
its equity heavy brethren CVY.
For those investors who want another option besides
building portfolio’s around REIT’s or Treasuries might want to consider the
active management space where two funds, the AdvisorShares YieldPro ETF (YPRO)
and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM), have stood out from the pack with
strong performance in 2015. Both funds
actively rotate between cash, fixed income and equities seeking to maximize
risk and return; YPRO does so with a targeted absolute volatility of between 2%
and 6% (according to AdvisorShares, it has around 2.65% since inception) while
INKM doesn’t specify any specific risk target.
These two funds might seem like convenient one-stop shopping and you
would be right because they were intended to be used as core holdings within a
portfolio, meaning that the principal downside for some asset allocators would
be the fact that the allocation does actually shift and could leave your
clients with more equity or interest rate risk than they would be comfortable
with.
Thank you for reading ETFG Perspectives!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.