Volatility has replaced the iPhone as China’s chief
export as second devastating week saw the venerable Dow Jones Industrial
Average and the NASDAQ tip into technical corrections while the S&P 500 is
now off 7.5% since peaking on July 20th. The relative calm at the start of the week
was shattered first by Wednesday’s early release of the FOMC minutes followed
by Thursday’s release of the Caixin PMI report that showed Chinese
manufacturing continued to contract for a six straight month. The outcome was that the S&P 500 closed
at the lows on both Thursday and Friday, losing 5.2% in two days and now more
than 100 points below the 200 day moving average and also erasing most of the
gains since last October’s pullback. There
were a few pockets of green to be found on ETFG’s heat map, so this week we
turn back to the ETFG Scanner to find opportunities for the more adventurous
investor.
While only a handful of utility stocks closed in positive
territory, it shouldn’t come as a surprise that the behavioral scores for the Utilities
sector continue to climb as investors seek safety in this classic defensive
play. Nearly all the domestic utility
funds currently tracked by ETFG, appear somewhere in the top 50 of ETFG technical
scores and measure relative momentum on either a short or intermediate term
basis. Investors continue to show their
love towards two of the biggest funds, despite their negative performance for
the week, with the Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund taking in $125 million in
new assets last week while their smaller competitor, the iShares U.S. Utilities
ETF (IDU), had to be content with a mere $22 million. For those who are curious as to why neither
fund appears in our Behavioral Top 25 List, the problem has to do with the
nature of utilities funds that typically have much lower implied volatility
than other sectors although one fund does make the grade. As the name implies, the PowerShares DWA Utilities
Momentum Portfolio (PUI) is a momentum based strategy of at least 30 names
built around the Dorsey Wright Utilities technical leader’s index and carries a
much higher ETFG Risk Rating in part due to its higher volatility. One little fund that did manage positive
performance last week was the Deutsche X-trackers Regulated Utilities ETF
(UTLT) thanks largely to the 16% of its allocation in Greater Europe where both
the Euro and Pound outperformed the dollar last week.
But if you were really looking for green last week, you
had to focus on gold where many of the mining stocks delivered positive (for a
change) double digit performance. Gold
and its more volatile and publicly traded cousin, the gold miners, have
seemingly returned to the role of a defensive equity play that they occupied
for nearly twenty years during the great bull market that began in 1982. While the miners saw a tremendous erosion of
value throughout that period, they would find temporary favor by delivering
positive performance during the intermittent pullbacks only to surrender those
gains as soon as the bull market resumed.
That historically negative correlation between the gold miners and the
rest of the equity market, seems to be back in force; since closing at a low of
$103.93 on August 5th, the SPDR Gold Trust Shares Fund (GLD) has gained 6.9%
while the Market Vectors Gold Miners Fund (GDX) is up nearly 17.57% in the same
period compared to a 6.1% loss for the S&P 500. Both funds have seen strong buying in the
last thirty minutes of each trade day, indicating that the smart money might be
behind much of the recent accumulation with GLD seeing $278 million in new
assets in the last two weeks compared to $28 million in GDX whose recent
performance and skyrocketing behavioral scores still hasn’t taken the sting out
of the 76% drop the fund endured since September of 2011.
Not everything that glittered last week was gold and the
volatility of the gold miners almost pales in comparison to that of two of the
Quantshares Market Neutral funds that saw their ETFG behavioral scores
skyrocket thanks to last week’s market pandemonium. The QuantShares U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta
Fund (BTAL) and the QuantShares U.S. Market Neutral Momentum Fund (MOM) both
recorded strong gains last week (3.95% and 2.25% respectively) as their unique
long/short strategies helped them outshine their more popular competitors in
the alpha-seeking and low volatility spheres.
Both funds focus on spread returns with BTAL’s strategy built around a
long portfolio of low beta stocks and a short portfolio of high beta with a
substantial gap between the two according to their last quarterly fact sheet
with the long portfolio at .78 and the short portfolio at 1.3. MOM has a similar strategy focusing on
momentum stocks although the difference in beta between the long and short portfolios
was less substantial and decidedly offered less power during last week’s rout. Before investors rush out to give ALL their
money to the two funds, consider their Red Diamond Risk scores which are
remarkably high given their lack of leverage.
MOM and BTAL both have deviation scores in excess of GDX’s while their
small asset size and low daily trade volumes give them elevated liquidity scores.
Thank you for reading ETF Global Perspectives!
________________________________________________________________
Assumptions,
opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this material
and are subject to change without notice.
ETF Global LLC (“ETFG”) and its affiliates and any third-party
providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or
agents (collectively ETFG Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness,
adequacy or timeliness of any information, including ratings and rankings and
are not responsible for errors and omissions or for the results obtained from
the use of such information and ETFG Parties shall have no liability for any
errors, omissions, or interruptions therein, regardless of the cause, or for
the results obtained from the use of such information. ETFG PARTIES DISCLAIM
ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, SUITABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
OR USE. In no event shall ETFG Parties
be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory,
punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or
losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and
opportunity costs) in connection with any use of the information contained in
this document even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
ETFG
ratings and rankings are statements of opinion as of the date they are
expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or
sell any securities or to make any investment decisions. ETFG ratings and
rankings should not be relied on when making any investment or other business
decision. ETFG’s opinions and analyses
do not address the suitability of any security.
ETFG does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor. While ETFG has obtained information from
sources they believe to be reliable, ETFG does not perform an audit or
undertake any duty of due diligence or independent verification of any
information it receives.
This
material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale
of any security or other financial instrument. Securities, financial
instruments or strategies mentioned herein may not be suitable for all
investors. Any opinions expressed herein
are given in good faith, are subject to change without notice, and are only
correct as of the stated date of their issue.
Prices, values, or income from any securities or investments mentioned
in this report may fall against the interests of the investor and the investor
may get back less than the amount invested.
Where an investment is described as being likely to yield income, please
note that the amount of income that the investor will receive from such an
investment may fluctuate. Where an
investment or security is denominated in a different currency to the investor's
currency of reference, changes in rates of exchange may have an adverse effect
on the value, price or income of or from that investment to the investor.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.