If there’s one thing that’s clear (or maybe not) from
last Friday’s disappointing (or secretly positive) jobs Report is that America
is back (or doomed!) Confused? Well then, you’re in good company as money
managers appear evenly split into two opposing camps; the first wonders whether April’s
Employment report signified that the economy is close to full employment that
further big gains are unlikely indicating that rates should begin to rise while
the second believes the dip in participation and flat lining earnings growth
indicates that it’s too soon for the Fed to take off the training wheels. After sorting for clues to which side is
strong in our ETFG Quant Movers and Top Behavioral Funds Reports, the one thing
that actually is clear to us is that someone is setting themselves up for
serious disappointment.
It’s easy to lose sight of the bigger picture when you’re
stuck in the minutiae of earnings seasons or debating what the Fed should or
shouldn’t do, but while most investors were busy reading headlines they missed
out on a major sector rotation that’s been underway for several weeks. Friday’s late rally may have helped stocks
end Friday on a positive note but the S&P 500 has now closed down for two
consecutive weeks, something that hasn’t happened since the rally started in
February, as a strong showing by materials and tech stocks couldn’t undo the
damage inflicted by healthcare stocks that still can’t find their footing. But while healthcare stocks and high yield
bond funds are licking their wounds, gold mining funds were off at the bar
celebrating as the Market Vectors Gold Miners Fund (GDX) rose over 3.9% on the
day while it’s junior miners counterpart, GDXJ, was up almost 5.5%. Gold bugs will tell you that the miners have
nowhere to go but up from here and while that may prove true, that they
desperately needed that win to prevent an embarrassing momentum reversal.
While we’ve been talking about Apple and Tesla, defensive
favorites like utilities, consumer staples but especially the gold miners have
been quietly taking over the top spots in our ETFG Behavioral Top Scorers
Report as the great 2016 rally looks increasingly overdone. The S&P 500 might be off just 1.65% in
the last two weeks but there’s been a substantial decline in the percentage of
stocks trading above their 50 day moving average as investors decide to sell in
May and go away or just rotate back into old favorites which is one reason why the
Utilities and Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Funds (XLU and XLP) are up
3.1% and 2.5% respectively while GDX is up an astounding 11.2%! In fact, visitors to our ETFG Behavioral Top
50 will note that 14 of the funds on that list are in one of those three
categories with XLU and XLP holding down the second and third spots
respectively (behind a junior gold miner of course) with even more funds
focused on low volatility or high dividend payers helping further boost the
presence of defensive names. Of course,
the only problem with being on top of the list is that it never lasts.
Now we’re not talking about karma or the wheel of
fortune, just that defensive funds have had the wind at their back and are now
richly priced and investors can be a fickle lot, never more so than in
late-stage bull markets. Consider that
all three of those categories had a spectacular start to 2016 after the Fed’s
first rate hike only to see their momentum slow when the broader market began
to find its footing in February when investors realized that the end was not
indeed nigh. By then the “defensives”
had pushed their way into overbought territory and needed time to cool off with
XLU and XLP both experiencing drawdowns that were saved by bouncing of the
fifty day moving average but neither fund has gotten back to their 2016 high.
It’s a different story for GDX who kissed the fifty-day
goodbye in February and hasn’t looked back although its most recent move higher that
began in April is far less steep than it was at the start of the year. And while they may sit at the top of the
Behavioral Charts, the “defensives” performance was generally spotty last week
with the exception of XLP which logged a series of steady advances while XLU
and GDX have been experiencing more volatility.
In fact, before Friday’s rally GDX was down almost 6.4% while a big
rally after Wednesday’s ADP report helped XLU close higher than the market for
the week although the spread between the two was much narrower than the prior
week’s.
Even Friday’s rally that helped the miners narrow the gap
was a bit of a headscratcher as the more bullish side of the market decided to
take a more positive view of the big “miss” as a sign of potentially reaching
“full employment” and a signal that traders are underestimating the possibility
of further rate hikes in 2016. Those
comments gave a boost to the PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP)
which despite breaking a prior support level several weeks ago has been slowing
its descent and trying to find a base.
But those looking for an equity sector that could stand to benefit the
most from shifting expectations should take another look at financials and bank
stocks whose behavioral scores have been plummeting towards rock bottom as
investors gave up any hope for another rate hike in 2016.
The reigning sector heavyweight remains the Financial
Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) which not only made our list of biggest
behavioral score losers for last week but also has the notoriety of having one
of the lowest ranked behavioral scores of any product in our database. Not far behind on that list are two bank
stock funds we’ve often discussed in these pages, the SPDR S&P Bank ETF
(KBE) and Regional Bank ETF (KRE) both of which, along with XLF, saw a .4% move
on Friday as investors cautiously eyed up a sector they had left for dead just
weeks before. Only time will tell which
side will be proven right, but for now it certainly does seem those adventurous
bullish investors are leaning into the wind.
Thank you for reading ETF Global Perspectives!
ETFG 21 Day Free
Trial: https://www.etfg.com/signup/quick
_____________________________________________________________
Assumptions,
opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this material and
are subject to change without notice.
ETF Global LLC (“ETFG”) and its affiliates and any third-party
providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or
agents (collectively ETFG Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness,
adequacy or timeliness of any information, including ratings and rankings and
are not responsible for errors and omissions or for the results obtained from
the use of such information and ETFG Parties shall have no liability for any
errors, omissions, or interruptions therein, regardless of the cause, or for
the results obtained from the use of such information. ETFG PARTIES DISCLAIM
ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, SUITABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
OR USE. In no event shall ETFG Parties
be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary,
compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses,
legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost
profits and opportunity costs) in connection with any use of the information
contained in this document even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
ETFG
ratings and rankings are statements of opinion as of the date they are
expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or
sell any securities or to make any investment decisions. ETFG ratings and
rankings should not be relied on when making any investment or other business
decision. ETFG’s opinions and analyses
do not address the suitability of any security.
ETFG does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor. While ETFG has obtained information from
sources they believe to be reliable, ETFG does not perform an audit or undertake
any duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it
receives.
This
material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale
of any security or other financial instrument. Securities, financial instruments
or strategies mentioned herein may not be suitable for all investors. Any opinions expressed herein are given in
good faith, are subject to change without notice, and are only correct as of
the stated date of their issue. Prices,
values, or income from any securities or investments mentioned in this report
may fall against the interests of the investor and the investor may get back
less than the amount invested. Where an
investment is described as being likely to yield income, please note that the
amount of income that the investor will receive from such an investment may
fluctuate. Where an investment or
security is denominated in a different currency to the investor's currency of
reference, changes in rates of exchange may have an adverse effect on the
value, price or income of or from that investment to the investor.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.