March 18, 2017 - The first month of the Spring 2017 ETF Global® Portfolio Challenge has come to a close in
what was a period marked by frequent change atop our leaderboard. As our investors continue to vie for the top
performing portfolio, let’s take a moment to examine the students who are
currently in the lead and the portfolio selections that have propelled them to
the top of the competition:
Spring 2017
ETFG Portfolio Challenge Top 10 – through 3/17
Name
|
School
|
Return
|
|
1
|
Steven Barber
|
Rochester Institute of
Tech
|
18.16%
|
2
|
Catherine St. Clair
|
St. John Fisher College
|
15.57%
|
3
|
Ethan O’Donnell
|
St. John Fisher College
|
15.53%
|
4
|
Phat Huynh
|
St. John Fisher College
|
14.49%
|
5
|
Dan Dang
|
St. John Fisher College
|
10.80%
|
6
|
Vlad Shevtsov
|
University of Georgia
|
10.15%
|
7
|
Rania Aghoutane
|
ESSEC Business School
|
8.55%
|
8
|
Miguel Afonso
|
Nova School of Bus and Econ
|
8.29%
|
9
|
Sagar Jain Prabhakar
|
University of Manitoba
|
7.54%
|
10
|
Michael Usherovich
|
Wilfrid Laurier University
|
7.06%
|
St. John Fisher
College continues to be well represented in our leaderboard, as they
currently feature 4 students in our top 5! We also have a new leader this week,
with Steven Barber from RIT vaulting from 7th place
last week to 1st overall. Attesting to the intensely competitive
nature of the challenge thus far, we also have 5 new entrants in our top 10
this week. Of those 5 students new to the leaderboard, Vlad Shevtsov from University of Georgia, Rania Aghoutane
from ESSEC, and Miguel Afonso from Nova School of Business and Economics,
and Sagar Jain Prabhakar from University
of Manitoba are the first contestants from their respective schools to
place in the top 10 so far.
Outperformance amongst our leaders this week was largely
driven by bullish wagers on precious metal ETPs. While a Federal Reserve
interest rate hike was almost universally expected, the cautious tone taken by
the fed helped spur a rally in precious metals, like gold and silver. Positions
in ETPs such as Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 3X Shares (JNUG), Direxion
Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 3x Shares (NUGT), VelocityShares 3x Long Silver
ETN (USLV), and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) were common
holdings by our leaders and helped fuel their returns. Paradoxically, the fed
rate hike was also followed by a rally in emerging market stocks. Investments
in emerging market ETPs, including the Direxion Daily MSCI India Bull 3X Shares
(INDL) and Direxion Daily Russia Bull 3x Shares (RUSL), helped our leaders capitalize
on this momentum. Lastly, as US housing starts rose to a near-decade high, positions
in the iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) served as another key source of
return.
With 6 weeks left the Spring 2017 ETF Global Portfolio Challenge, there will surely be
more change to occur at the top of our leaderboard. We will continue to keep you updated as the
challenge progresses!
Thank you for reading ETF Global Perspectives!
_____________________________________________________________
Assumptions,
opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this material and
are subject to change without notice. ETF Global LLC (“ETFG”) and its
affiliates and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers,
shareholders, employees or agents (collectively ETFG Parties) do not guarantee
the accuracy, completeness, adequacy or timeliness of any information,
including ratings and rankings and are not responsible for errors and omissions
or for the results obtained from the use of such information and ETFG Parties
shall have no liability for any errors, omissions, or interruptions therein,
regardless of the cause, or for the results obtained from the use of such
information. ETFG PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES,
INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, SUITABILITY OR
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE. In no event shall ETFG Parties
be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary,
compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses,
legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost
profits and opportunity costs) in connection with any use of the information
contained in this document even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
ETFG ratings and rankings are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions. ETFG ratings and rankings should not be relied on when making any investment or other business decision. ETFG’s opinions and analyses do not address the suitability of any security. ETFG does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor. While ETFG has obtained information from sources they believe to be reliable, ETFG does not perform an audit or undertake any duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives.
ETFG ratings and rankings are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions. ETFG ratings and rankings should not be relied on when making any investment or other business decision. ETFG’s opinions and analyses do not address the suitability of any security. ETFG does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor. While ETFG has obtained information from sources they believe to be reliable, ETFG does not perform an audit or undertake any duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives.
This material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or other financial instrument. Securities, financial instruments or strategies mentioned herein may not be suitable for all investors. Any opinions expressed herein are given in good faith, are subject to change without notice, and are only correct as of the stated date of their issue. Prices, values, or income from any securities or investments mentioned in this report may fall against the interests of the investor and the investor may get back less than the amount invested. Where an investment is described as being likely to yield income, please note that the amount of income that the investor will receive from such an investment may fluctuate. Where an investment or security is denominated in a different currency to the investor's currency of reference, changes in rates of exchange may have an adverse effect on the value, price or income of or from that investment to the investor.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.