Thursday, January 4, 2018 - “Out with the old, in
with the new” may be the unofficial mantra of every New Year’s Eve celebration,
but investors might be hoping for an instant replay as far as their portfolios
are concerned. After all, they got an
early Christmas present in the guise of tax reform which was a perfect way to
cap twelve straight months of positive gains (and of course new highs) for
stocks. Big shoes to fill indeed.
The new year is also the start of another quarter which includes an
update to the ETFG Dynamic Model Portfolios. All 4 of the Base portfolios and
the 8 “Tilts” rebalanced on Tuesday, January 2nd and while 2017
might have been a low volatility snooze fest, there have been significant
changes to the allocations for 1Q 2018.
Out
with the old was also the mantra of our ETFG Quant Model with 3 fund
replacements in the domestic sleeve of the portfolios this quarter and while it
continues to favor both Small Cap and factor-based funds, there has been a
significant shift in its underlying makeup.
The sole survivor from last quarter was the Direxion NASDAQ 100 Equal
Weighted Fund (QQQE) a solid performer that remains in the top position
followed by SPDR Portfolio Small Cap (SPSM), JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S.
Small Cap Equity (JPSE) and iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor USA (LRGF). Leaving the allocation are the VictoryShares
US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Weighted Fund (CSB), the Guggenheim
S&P Smallcap 600 Pure Value ETF (RZV) and the JP Morgan Diversified Return
U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME.)
The
replacement of CSB and RZV with two other core-Small Cap funds means the model portfolios retain significant exposure to smaller stocks but shifts that
exposure to more core and growth oriented names at the expense of value
stocks. Helping this trend is the
addition of LRGF, which as the ticker implies has a more Large-Cap focus than
its Mid-Cap oriented predecessor, JPME.
Changes
to the Developed International sleeve were more modest with 2 products that
continued into the new allocations and 2 new funds being added to the lineup. The model continues to favor single-country
exposure although with a decidedly Asian flair as the iShares MSCI Singapore
Capped ETF (EWS) replaces the iShares MSCI Spain Capped (EWP) with the iShares
MSCI South Korea Capped (EWY) fund staying in the portfolio. Tensions over Catalonia may have cooled in
the short-term but the long-term outcome is harder to see which has depressed
EWP’s price momentum, but not to the point where a rebound might be imminent.
The
model also favors factor funds with the iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor
International ETF (INTF) holding onto the top position where it is joined by
the PowerShares FTSE International Low Beta Equal Weight (IDLB) which replaces
the VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI.) IBLD and MOTI are both considered large cap
funds, although the similarities end there.
MOTI has fewer holdings and focuses on companies with well-established
brands while IBLD has a more Asian orientation and relies on the “low
volatility” phenomenon to deliver its risk-adjusted returns.
Finally,
the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity (GEM) replaced the
Franklin LibertyQ Emerging Markets (FLQE) ETF as the primary diversified
Emerging Markets product. Both funds
rely on multifactor models with the major difference being that GEM currently
has a larger average market cap, as well as, larger exposure to mainland China.
You
can find an overview and performance information for the ETF Global Dynamic
Model Portfolios at http://www.etfg.com/about-model-portfolios
Thank
you for reading ETFG Perspectives!
ETFG
21 Day Free Trial: https://www.etfg.com/signup/quick
_____________________________________________________________
Assumptions,
opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this material
and are subject to change without notice.
ETF Global LLC (“ETFG”) and its affiliates and any third-party
providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or
agents (collectively ETFG Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness,
adequacy or timeliness of any information, including ratings and rankings and
are not responsible for errors and omissions or for the results obtained from
the use of such information and ETFG Parties shall have no liability for any
errors, omissions, or interruptions therein, regardless of the cause, or for
the results obtained from the use of such information. ETFG PARTIES DISCLAIM
ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, SUITABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
OR USE. In no event shall ETFG Parties
be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary,
compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses,
legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost
profits and opportunity costs) in connection with any use of the information
contained in this document even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
ETFG
ratings and rankings are statements of opinion as of the date they are
expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or
sell any securities or to make any investment decisions. ETFG ratings and
rankings should not be relied on when making any investment or other business
decision. ETFG’s opinions and analyses
do not address the suitability of any security.
ETFG does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor. While ETFG has obtained information from
sources they believe to be reliable, ETFG does not perform an audit or
undertake any duty of due diligence or independent verification of any
information it receives.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.