For us at ETF Global, the start of a new quarter means something much more concrete; that it’s time to revisit the ETFG Dynamic Model Portfolios. The 4 base portfolios and the 8 “tilts” were updated on July 2nd and the wide performance differences between different sectors and style boxes are having a major impact on the models. Both the domestic and international sleeves saw significant changes with three funds leaving each with only the emerging market portfolio staying the same with both the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and First Trust Chindia ETF (FNI) being retained for another quarter.
Among the domestic funds, only the Direxion NASDAQ 100 Equal Weighted Fund (QQQE) holds onto its spot in the line-up once again where it’s joined by the SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV), the SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV), and the SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SLY) while the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG), SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) and WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Dividend Fund (DON) depart the strategy. The result is the domestic portfolio has seen a substantial reduction in its average weighted market cap while the pendulum between value and growth has shifted towards the middle ground as financials gain more exposure at the expense of tech stocks.
The shift in the portfolio is easier to understand when you consider that large cap equities may have struggled to hold onto their gains last quarter, but their small-cap brethren had no such issues with SLY up over 9% while the iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) was up nearly 8%. That strong momentum was one of the driving forces that propelled a number of funds focused on smaller names up our list of top Quant funds although we should note that all four of the domestic funds have excellent fundamental scores as well. In fact, while the three additions to the portfolio have seen an increase in short-term momentum which lifted their aggregate score, their sentiment scores were substantially higher with each having high implied volatility and short interest. Compare that with SPYG and SPYV which have seen a steady drop in their behavioral scores as large caps continue to lose ground to smaller names.
U.S. equities generally had a solid quarter, the winners on the international side in the second quarter were those were those who lost the least as emerging market stocks continued to be hit by Fed fears while trade war talk hurt even the developed markets. That helped drive a major shift in the international side of the portfolio as it reduced Asian exposure to a more European orientation thanks to the departure of the two broad funds, the iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) and iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Intl ETF (INTF) along with one of the country specific funds, the iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS). Taking their place are the iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) and Goldman Sachs Active Beta International Equity ETF (GSIE) along with the iShares MSCI United Kingdom Fund (EWU) where the Brexit debate continues to weigh on valuations while helping boost its sentiment scores.
You can find an overview and performance information for the ETF Global Dynamic Model Portfolios at http://www.etfg.com/about-model-portfolios
Thank you for reading ETF Global Perspectives!
ETFG 21 Day Free Trial: https://www.etfg.com/signup/quick
Assumptions, opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. ETF Global LLC (“ETFG”) and its affiliates and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively ETFG Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, adequacy or timeliness of any information, including ratings and rankings and are not responsible for errors and omissions or for the results obtained from the use of such information and ETFG Parties shall have no liability for any errors, omissions, or interruptions therein, regardless of the cause, or for the results obtained from the use of such information. ETFG PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, SUITABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE. In no event shall ETFG Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs) in connection with any use of the information contained in this document even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
ETFG ratings and rankings are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions. ETFG ratings and rankings should not be relied on when making any investment or other business decision. ETFG’s opinions and analyses do not address the suitability of any security. ETFG does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor. While ETFG has obtained information from sources they believe to be reliable, ETFG does not perform an audit or undertake any duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives.
This material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or other financial instrument. Securities, financial instruments or strategies mentioned herein may not be suitable for all investors. Any opinions expressed herein are given in good faith, are subject to change without notice, and are only correct as of the stated date of their issue. Prices, values, or income from any securities or investments mentioned in this report may fall against the interests of the investor and the investor may get back less than the amount invested. Where an investment is described as being likely to yield income, please note that the amount of income that the investor will receive from such an investment may fluctuate. Where an investment or security is denominated in a different currency to the investor's currency of reference, changes in rates of exchange may have an adverse effect on the value, price or income of or from that investment to the investor.
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.