For us at ETF Global, the start of a new quarter means
something much more concrete; that it’s time to revisit the ETFG Dynamic Model
Portfolios. The 4 base portfolios and the 8 “tilts” were updated on
July 2nd and the wide performance differences between different
sectors and style boxes are having a major impact on the models. Both the
domestic and international sleeves saw significant changes with three
funds leaving each with only the emerging market portfolio staying the same
with both the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and First Trust Chindia
ETF (FNI) being retained for another quarter.
Among the domestic funds, only the Direxion NASDAQ 100
Equal Weighted Fund (QQQE) holds onto its spot in the line-up once again where
it’s joined by the SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV), the SPDR S&P
600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV), and the SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SLY)
while the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG), SPDR Portfolio S&P
500 Value ETF (SPYV) and WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Dividend Fund (DON) depart the
strategy. The result is the domestic portfolio has seen a substantial reduction
in its average weighted market cap while the pendulum between value and growth
has shifted towards the middle ground as financials gain more exposure at the
expense of tech stocks.
The shift in the portfolio is easier to understand when
you consider that large cap equities may have struggled to hold onto their
gains last quarter, but their small-cap brethren had no such issues with SLY up
over 9% while the iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) was up nearly 8%. That strong
momentum was one of the driving forces that propelled a number of funds focused
on smaller names up our list of top Quant funds although we should note that
all four of the domestic funds have excellent fundamental scores as well. In
fact, while the three additions to the portfolio have seen an increase in short-term
momentum which lifted their aggregate score, their sentiment scores were
substantially higher with each having high implied volatility and short
interest. Compare that with SPYG and SPYV which have seen a steady drop in
their behavioral scores as large caps continue to lose ground to smaller names.
U.S. equities generally had a solid quarter, the winners
on the international side in the second quarter were those were those who lost
the least as emerging market stocks continued to be hit by Fed fears while
trade war talk hurt even the developed markets. That helped drive a major shift
in the international side of the portfolio as it reduced Asian exposure to a
more European orientation thanks to the departure of the two broad funds, the iShares
Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) and iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Intl ETF (INTF) along
with one of the country specific funds, the iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS).
Taking their place are the iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets
ETF (IDEV) and Goldman Sachs Active Beta International Equity ETF (GSIE) along
with the iShares MSCI United Kingdom Fund (EWU) where the Brexit debate
continues to weigh on valuations while helping boost its sentiment scores.
You can find an overview and performance
information for the ETF Global Dynamic Model Portfolios at http://www.etfg.com/about-model-portfolios
Thank you for reading ETF Global Perspectives!
ETFG 21 Day Free Trial:
https://www.etfg.com/signup/quick
Assumptions,
opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this material
and are subject to change without notice.
ETF Global LLC (“ETFG”) and its affiliates and any third-party
providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or
agents (collectively ETFG Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness,
adequacy or timeliness of any information, including ratings and rankings and
are not responsible for errors and omissions or for the results obtained from
the use of such information and ETFG Parties shall have no liability for any
errors, omissions, or interruptions therein, regardless of the cause, or for
the results obtained from the use of such information. ETFG PARTIES DISCLAIM
ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, SUITABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
OR USE. In no event shall ETFG Parties
be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary,
compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses,
legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost
profits and opportunity costs) in connection with any use of the information
contained in this document even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
ETFG
ratings and rankings are statements of opinion as of the date they are
expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or
sell any securities or to make any investment decisions. ETFG ratings and
rankings should not be relied on when making any investment or other business
decision. ETFG’s opinions and analyses
do not address the suitability of any security.
ETFG does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor. While ETFG has obtained information from
sources they believe to be reliable, ETFG does not perform an audit or
undertake any duty of due diligence or independent verification of any
information it receives.
This material is not
intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security
or other financial instrument. Securities, financial instruments or strategies
mentioned herein may not be suitable for all investors. Any opinions expressed herein are given in
good faith, are subject to change without notice, and are only correct as of
the stated date of their issue. Prices,
values, or income from any securities or investments mentioned in this report
may fall against the interests of the investor and the investor may get back
less than the amount invested. Where an
investment is described as being likely to yield income, please note that the
amount of income that the investor will receive from such an investment may
fluctuate. Where an investment or
security is denominated in a different currency to the investor's currency of
reference, changes in rates of exchange may have an adverse effect on the
value, price or income of or from that investment to the investor.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.