Next week, the main focus
will be on the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) decision on Wednesday, where
the Fed is generally expected to raise rates by 25 bps. Other important
economics include releasing housing and building stats on Tuesday, along with
consumer confidence on Friday. Typically, stocks have risen along with the
underlying fundamentals of economic and earnings growth, which has a strong
chance of remaining positive – making long-term picks the "deal of the day.”
Most major benchmarks
ended lower for the week. The technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index (Fidelity
NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ)) held up best
and ending the week in positive territory for the year-to-date period. Smaller-Cap
shares performed worst, with both the S&P MidCap 400 Index (SPDR S&P
Midcap 400 ETF Trust (MDY)) and the Russell
2000 Index (iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM)) hitting new
52-week lows. Within the S&P 500 Index, Utilities shares performed best (Utilities
Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU)), while Financial
shares (Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF)) were notably
weak due to concerns over tighter lending margins due to declines in
longer-term Treasury yields.
ETFG Weekly Quant
Movers – In the ETFG Quant
Movers, we saw both Sector and Factor oriented ETFs gain the most percentage
points to their overall scores. To highlight a few, Invesco Global Agriculture
ETF (PAGG) and WisdomTree International Dividend
Ex-Financials Fund (DOO)
saw a 18.02% and 17.50% gain respectively. While USAA MSCI International Value
Momentum Blend Index ETF (UIVM)
and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV)
had a 21.73% and 18.92% respective gain to their Quant Total Score.
Honorable mentions in the
loser’s column, we saw a blend of ETPs dropping some percentage points to their
overall score. The iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT), Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Oppenheimer Russell 2000 Dynamic
Multifactor ETF (OMFS)
lost 22.46%, 20.84% and 19.74% to their overall scores respectively.
ETFG Weekly Select List - the 5 most highly rated ETFs per Sector,
Geographic Region and Strategy as ranked by the ETFG Quant model.
Since we’ve seen some
major volatility within the financial sector the last week, we’d like to
highlight some substantial movement when comparing this week’s Select List to
last. The top three spots have completely changed hands. In order from 1st
to 3rd, added to the list were First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO),
Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF (KBWD) and Fidelity
MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL). Also, notable
movement was seen in the Technology sector where First Trust Nasdaq
Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) moved to the 1st
position and SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) claimed 3rd,
moving from second and fourth spots respectively.
Thanks for reading ETF
Global Perspectives!
ETFG 21 Day Free Trial: https://www.etfg.com/signup/quick
_____________________________________________________________
Assumptions,
opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this material
and are subject to change without notice.
ETF Global LLC (“ETFG”) and its affiliates and any third-party
providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or
agents (collectively ETFG Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness,
adequacy or timeliness of any information, including ratings and rankings and
are not responsible for errors and omissions or for the results obtained from
the use of such information and ETFG Parties shall have no liability for any errors,
omissions, or interruptions therein, regardless of the cause, or for the
results obtained from the use of such information. ETFG PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY
AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, SUITABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
OR USE. In no event shall ETFG Parties
be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary,
compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses,
legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost
profits and opportunity costs) in connection with any use of the information
contained in this document even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
ETFG
ratings and rankings are statements of opinion as of the date they are
expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or
sell any securities or to make any investment decisions. ETFG ratings and
rankings should not be relied on when making any investment or other business
decision. ETFG’s opinions and analyses
do not address the suitability of any security.
ETFG does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor. While ETFG has obtained information from
sources they believe to be reliable, ETFG does not perform an audit or
undertake any duty of due diligence or independent verification of any
information it receives.
This
material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale
of any security or other financial instrument. Securities, financial
instruments or strategies mentioned herein may not be suitable for all
investors. Any opinions expressed herein
are given in good faith, are subject to change without notice, and are only
correct as of the stated date of their issue.
Prices, values, or income from any securities or investments mentioned
in this report may fall against the interests of the investor and the investor
may get back less than the amount invested.
Where an investment is described as being likely to yield income, please
note that the amount of income that the investor will receive from such an
investment may fluctuate. Where an
investment or security is denominated in a different currency to the investor's
currency of reference, changes in rates of exchange may have an adverse effect
on the value, price or income of or from that investment to the investor.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.