Despite a benign shift in global central bank policy and the
brightening prospect of a U.S.-China trade deal, investors still have to
contend with issues such as still unresolved trade disputes, sluggish economic
data, Brexit uncertainty and escalating U.S.-Iranian military tensions. Any
negative developments in these array of issues threaten to disrupt the delicate
balance of factors that have currently favored rising equity prices.
Unaffected by these looming threats, stocks surged into record
territory this week, with the DJIA, S&P 500, and NASDAQ rising 2.4%, 2.2.%,
and 3.0% respectively. As of Friday, the DJIA is up 7.7.% for the month, which
would mark its best monthly performance since October 2015 and best June since
1938. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 notched a record close on Thursday and its
7.2% monthly advance would be its best June performance since 1955. Adding to
this banner month, NASDAQ's 7.8% gain would be its best June since the 2000
amid the dot-com euphoria.
These gains also coincided with a further decline in 10 year
Treasury yields, which sank below 2.0% for the first time since 2016 before
recovering to end the week at 2.04%. The continued decline of global government
bond yields adds another mixed signal to the global economic picture and will
be a dynamic worth monitoring in the coming weeks.
ETFG Quant Winners: The easing of global trade tensions
helped fuel this week’s biggest Quant score gainers. From 1-5, this week's top
gainers were the Global X MSCI China Communication Services ETF
(CHIC), Bernstein Global Research Fund (BRGL), Franklin FTSE Hong
Kong ETF (FLHK), Developed International Equity Select ETF (RNDM),
and SPDR Solactive Canada ETF (ZCAN).
ETFG Quant Losers: The ETFs suffering the biggest Quant
declines were more of a mixed bag this week. From 1-5, the top losers
were First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY), iShares
Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (JKJ), Principal Sustainable Momentum Index ETF
(PMOM), iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN), and FlexShares
Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index Fund (TLTE).
ETFG
Weekly Select List - the five most highly rated ETFs per
Sector, Geographic Region and Strategy as ranked by the ETFG
Quant model.
Following an apparent breakthrough in U.S.-China trade talks we'd
like to focus on the weekly changes amongst ETFs in the Asia-Pacific geographic
group. With the exception of two ETFs swapping the 3rd and 4th spots, no
changes occurred in the composition of our top 5 rated Asia-Pacific funds from
last week to now. While progress in U.S.-China trade discussions served as a
catalyst for this week's market action, our model is more forward-looking and
long-term oriented in its outlook and is appreciably less sensitive to such
short-term fluctuations. For long-term upside plays in the Asia-Pacific region,
consider our top 5 rated ETFs, which may be better able to withstand ongoing
global trade tensions - 1) First Trust Chindia ETF (FNI), 2) iShares
MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY), 3) iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM),
4) iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI), and 5) WisdomTree Asia-Pacific
ex-Japan Fund (AXJL).
Thanks for reading ETF Global Perspectives
ETFG 21 Day Free Trial: https://www.etfg.com/signup/quick
_______________________________________________________
Assumptions,
opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this material
and are subject to change without notice.
ETF Global LLC (“ETFG”) and its affiliates and any third-party
providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or
agents (collectively ETFG Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness,
adequacy or timeliness of any information, including ratings and rankings and
are not responsible for errors and omissions or for the results obtained from
the use of such information and ETFG Parties shall have no liability for any
errors, omissions, or interruptions therein, regardless of the cause, or for
the results obtained from the use of such information. ETFG PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY
AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, SUITABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
OR USE. In no event shall ETFG Parties
be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary,
compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses,
legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost
profits and opportunity costs) in connection with any use of the information
contained in this document even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
ETFG
ratings and rankings are statements of opinion as of the date they are
expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or
sell any securities or to make any investment decisions. ETFG ratings and
rankings should not be relied on when making any investment or other business
decision. ETFG’s opinions and analyses
do not address the suitability of any security.
ETFG does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor. While ETFG has obtained information from
sources they believe to be reliable, ETFG does not perform an audit or
undertake any duty of due diligence or independent verification of any
information it receives.
This
material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale
of any security or other financial instrument. Securities, financial
instruments or strategies mentioned herein may not be suitable for all
investors. Any opinions expressed herein
are given in good faith, are subject to change without notice, and are only
correct as of the stated date of their issue.
Prices, values, or income from any securities or investments mentioned
in this report may fall against the interests of the investor and the investor
may get back less than the amount invested.
Where an investment is described as being likely to yield income, please
note that the amount of income that the investor will receive from such an
investment may fluctuate. Where an
investment or security is denominated in a different currency to the investor's
currency of reference, changes in rates of exchange may have an adverse effect
on the value, price or income of or from that investment to the investor.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.