The mixture of better than anticipated economic data, encouraging corporate earnings and the signing of the "phase-one" trade agreement pushed U.S. stocks to new record highs last week. The S&P 500 (+2.0%), Nasdaq Composite (+2.3%), and Russell 2000 (+2.5%) all rose at least 2.0%, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (+1.8%) trailed right behind. In addition, six of the eleven S&P 500 sectors wrapped up the week with gains of at least 2.0%, including a 3.8% gain in the typically defensive leaning Utilities sector. The energy sector was the only sector to finish lower, dipping -1.1% as oil prices continued to fall.
Investors now turn their attention back to corporate earnings after solid results from the biggest banks on Wall Street. Netflix (NFLX) reports fourth-quarter results Tuesday, showing the effect of the new from Disney (DIS) streaming service. Texas Instruments (TXN) also reports Tuesday night, with chip names Intel (INTC), STMicroelectronics (STM) and Skyworks Solutions (SWKS) reporting later in the week. For investors looking to diligence which ETFs have the most exposure to these stocks, please take advantage of ETFG’s Grey Market Summary.
In looking at individual ETF flows, the Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) topped inflows list, with a net flow of just under $1.5 billion. Also on the top five list was the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV), the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT), the iShares ESG MSCI U.S.A. ETF (ESGU) and the First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS). Each ETF brought in approximately $1 billion in new AUM respectively. In weekly outflows, we saw Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) drop approximately $1.5 billion in redemptions.
ETFG Quant Movers - Those ETFs who have had the largest weekly change in their respective, overall ETFG Quant ratings.
ETFG Quant Winners: The top five gainers in Quant Total Score were Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV), iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR), First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FNX), Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF (VIOO), and First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF (FTXR). Each ETP added well over 18% to their overall Quant.
ETFG Quant Losers: Honorable mentions in the loser category were Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL), WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ), iShares Dow Jones U.S. ETF (IYY), Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) and Vanguard Communication Services ETF (VOX). The reasons for the drop in quant scores can be traced to fundamental and behavioral factors.
ETFG Weekly Select List - The five most highly rated ETFs per Sector, Geographic Region and Strategy as ranked by the ETFG Quant model.
Considering the sector’s success, we’d like to highlight the top ETFs within the Utilities sector in this week’s Select List. John Hancock Multifactor Utilities ETF (JHMU) moved from the 3rd position to claim 1st followed by Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) which jumped two spots from 4th to 2nd. Newcomers to this week’s Select List were Global X MSCI China Utilities ETF (CHIU) in 3rd, Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) in 4th and iShares Global Utilities ETF (JXI) in 5th.
Thanks for reading ETF Global Perspectives!
ETFG 21 Day Free Trial: https://www.etfg.com/signup/quick
Assumptions, opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. ETF Global LLC (“ETFG”) and its affiliates and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively ETFG Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, adequacy or timeliness of any information, including ratings and rankings and are not responsible for errors and omissions or for the results obtained from the use of such information and ETFG Parties shall have no liability for any errors, omissions, or interruptions therein, regardless of the cause, or for the results obtained from the use of such information. ETFG PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, SUITABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE. In no event shall ETFG Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs) in connection with any use of the information contained in this document even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
ETFG ratings and rankings are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions. ETFG ratings and rankings should not be relied on when making any investment or other business decision. ETFG’s opinions and analyses do not address the suitability of any security. ETFG does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor. While ETFG has obtained information from sources they believe to be reliable, ETFG does not perform an audit or undertake any duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives.
This material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or other financial instrument. Securities, financial instruments or strategies mentioned herein may not be suitable for all investors. Any opinions expressed herein are given in good faith, are subject to change without notice, and are only correct as of the stated date of their issue. Prices, values, or income from any securities or investments mentioned in this report may fall against the interests of the investor and the investor may get back less than the amount invested. Where an investment is described as being likely to yield income, please note that the amount of income that the investor will receive from such an investment may fluctuate. Where an investment or security is denominated in a different currency to the investor's currency of reference, changes in rates of exchange may have an adverse effect on the value, price or income.