On Tuesday, the Dow Jones
Industrial Average had its best day since 1933 and the S&P 500 Index
experienced its largest daily rally since October 2008. Looking at the numbers
for the week, the DJIA surged 12.8%, the S&P 500 rallied 10.3% and the
Nasdaq Composite gained 9.1%. Even beaten-down energy shares outperformed due
to U.S. officials putting pressure on Saudi Arabia to end its price war with
Russia. Airline shares also bounced back midweek on the arrival of a $60
billion bailout package as part of the stimulus bill and a rebound in Boeing
boosted the Industrial sector. Utilities shares were also strong while communication
services shares lagged.
Though another historic
week in terms of stock market volatility, ETF fund flows saw modest changes
considering all the news. The one exception, however, was iShares iBoxx USD
Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) which saw over $5
billion in new assets as the Federal Reserve began purchasing investment-grade
corporate bond ETFs to help stabilize the credit markets. Also on the top five inflow
list was Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ),
SPDR Gold Trust (GLD,) SPDR
Bloomberg Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) and Vanguard S&P
500 ETF (VOO). Invesco
QQQ Trust (QQQ) saw a
$2.5 billion inflow while the remaining ETFs each brought in approximately $1.5
billion respectively. For outflows, the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV), the iShares Core U.S.
Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG)
and the PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) topped the list for
the week, losing $3.5 billion, $2.5 billion and $1.2 billion respectively.
ETFG
Quant Movers - Those ETFs who have had the
largest weekly change in their respective, overall ETFG Quant ratings.
ETFG Quant Winners:
The top five gainers in their ETFG Quant Score were iPath S&P MLP ETN (IMLP), Innovator IBD ETF Leaders ETF (LDRS), Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF (FLEH), Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF), and VictoryShares Developed Enhanced Volatility
Wtd ETF (CIZ).
Each ETP added anywhere from 41.42% to 20.98% to their overall ETFG Quant Score.
ETFG Quant Losers:
Honorable mentions in the loser category were First Trust Preferred Securities
and Income ETF (FPE),
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG),
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE), ELEMENTS SPECTRUM ETN (EEH) and First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX
Fund (FSZ).
Each ETF lost around 25% in Quant Total Score and the reasons for the drop can
be traced to mostly behavioral factors.
ETFG
Weekly Select List - The five
most highly rated ETFs per Sector, Geographic Region and Strategy as ranked by
the ETFG Quant model.
Considering the sector’s bounce
back from extreme lows, we would like to highlight the top ETFs within the Energy
sector in this week’s Select List. SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) held on the 1st
place while U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) and Fidelity MSCI
Industrials Index ETF (FIDU)
who are new to the list for the week claimed 2nd and 3rd
respectively. Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF (PSCI) moved from 2nd
to claim 4th and Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) jumped down one
position to the 5th spot.
Thanks for reading ETF Global Perspectives!
ETFG 21 Day Free Trial: https://www.etfg.com/signup/quick
_______________________________________________________
Assumptions, opinions and estimates constitute
our judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without
notice. ETF Global LLC (“ETFG”) and its
affiliates and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers,
shareholders, employees or agents (collectively ETFG Parties) do not guarantee
the accuracy, completeness, adequacy or timeliness of any information,
including ratings and rankings and are not responsible for errors and omissions
or for the results obtained from the use of such information and ETFG Parties
shall have no liability for any errors, omissions, or interruptions therein,
regardless of the cause, or for the results obtained from the use of such
information. ETFG PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES,
INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, SUITABILITY OR
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE.
In no event shall ETFG Parties be liable to any party for any direct,
indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or
consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including,
without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs) in
connection with any use of the information contained in this document even if
advised of the possibility of such damages.
ETFG ratings and rankings are statements of
opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or
recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any
investment decisions. ETFG ratings and rankings should not be relied on when
making any investment or other business decision. ETFG’s opinions and analyses do not address
the suitability of any security. ETFG
does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor. While ETFG has obtained information from
sources they believe to be reliable, ETFG does not perform an audit or
undertake any duty of due diligence or independent verification of any
information it receives.
This material is not intended as an offer or
solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or other financial
instrument. Securities, financial instruments or strategies mentioned herein
may not be suitable for all investors.
Any opinions expressed herein are given in good faith, are subject to
change without notice, and are only correct as of the stated date of their
issue. Prices, values, or income from
any securities or investments mentioned in this report may fall against the
interests of the investor and the investor may get back less than the amount
invested. Where an investment is
described as being likely to yield income, please note that the amount of income
that the investor will receive from such an investment may fluctuate. Where an investment or security is
denominated in a different currency to the investor's currency of reference,
changes in rates of exchange may have an adverse effect on the value, price or
income.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.